H=X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:Received:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Date ) by .uk (Postfix) with ESMTP idĭomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1 q=dns c=nofws ī=KYPzv/ekqRajwDSSFBeSqb/kKZCEv48OXrOBKcbyeVsfZ5kakSK2xRTEOtRuWGNWo0x1sMS9eIvn9+47vkV4odOovvsmjD8xQhFokor+uri0K+k9Hd3SgNN9J+QGQxfUqeur7u15zix8NkBNONdPYtKvi1l9MGGAiYuz/rHniKA= (localhost.localdomain ) by .uk (Postfix) Shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,URI_WPADMIN X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 () on (localhost.localdomain ) by .uk (Postfix) with After all the similar ones sent before I cannot understand why they are not automatically detected.
Spamsieve airmail 3 software#
The ‘NatWest’ one is easily detected by the email hosts spam software however this is not conveninet for me to use to block. If you take the Metro Bank there are a dozen or more things wrong with the header. Below are two very crude phishing emails. Still the most basic and high volume spam gets through undetected. Have been training this for some months now. When switched email software Spamsieve was only junk filtering offered.
0 kommentar(er)
